Local business? Support local news on Richardson.city

Back to Sport

Kevin Jennings Gives SMU a National Case the CFP Ranking Left Unfinished

SMU went unranked Tuesday, but Kevin Jennings’ passing efficiency and production remain too substantial to dismiss, even with the Mustangs’ road losses.

Sasha Yoder· AI-assisted, edited by Jake Team

November 11, 20264 min read

Kevin Jennings has already put his name across SMU’s career passing records. Eighty touchdown passes, 10,473 passing yards and 834 completions leave little room to call his production a brief hot streak. Tuesday night supplied the frustrating contrast.

The College Football Playoff committee’s second top 25 included no place for the 7-2 Mustangs, even as their quarterback’s season numbers gave individual award voters plenty to consider.

For SMU, that omission is the uncomfortable part of the story. The Mustangs are 7-2 overall and 5-2 in the ACC, but their record is split sharply by venue: 6-0 at home and 1-2 on the road. Jennings can make the offense look like a national-level operation. He cannot make two road defeats disappear from the committee’s evaluation.

The latest evidence arrived in the Nov. 6 victory over Virginia Tech. Jennings completed 24 of 32 passes for 350 yards and four touchdowns. Yamir Knight caught six passes for 103 yards and three touchdowns, while Jennings also completed passes to seven other receivers.

That distribution matters because it describes an offense with more than one productive outlet. Knight had the loudest statistical afternoon, but Jennings supplied the precision and volume that allowed it to happen.

A 24-for-32 performance with 350 yards is not simply a high completion rate. It combines accuracy with substantial production per completion, and the four touchdown passes turned that production into points. The result was a performance that did not require Jennings to carry the entire passing game through one target.

Seven other receivers were involved, giving the offense a broader shape than a single-player highlight reel.

His broader SMU résumé helps explain why the quarterback belongs in the national discussion even while the team waits outside the rankings. Jennings has 80 touchdown passes, 10,473 passing yards, 834 completions and 11,164 yards of total offense in his SMU career. Jennings has a 26-9 record as a starter, including a 16-1 mark at Gerald J. Ford Stadium.

Those numbers describe sustained production, not one fortunate Saturday.

They also show why individual acclaim has limits. SMU’s home record is excellent, but the road losses came at Louisville and Syracuse. The Mustangs won at Florida State, and they have added strong home results against California and Virginia Tech, yet the committee is assessing the full team rather than awarding a separate quarterback ranking.

A passer can produce 25 touchdown throws and still leave his team needing more from the rest of the season’s résumé.

Tuesday’s list made that tension plain. Georgia led the rankings, while Notre Dame rose to No. 5, Texas sat at No. 6, Texas Tech moved to No. 12 and Wake Forest climbed to No. 13. SMU was unranked.

The Mustangs’ remaining schedule includes Wake Forest at home Saturday, then road games at Notre Dame on Nov. 21 and Stanford on Nov. 28. The schedule offers two ranked opponents, but it does not promise a ranking or erase the earlier losses.

The award attention is substantial without being overstated. SMU announced Tuesday that Jennings was included in the Davey O’Brien quarterback class of candidates. The semifinalists are scheduled for Nov. 17, finalists for Nov. 24 and the winner for Dec. 11.

Jennings and Knight also received Earl Campbell Tyler Rose Award honorable mentions. Candidate status is not finalist status, and an honorable mention is not a trophy. Still, the recognition aligns with Jennings’ production rather than asking voters to imagine a case that is not there.

The committee’s format is built around teams: a 12-team field, a protected place for the highest-ranked team across six designated leagues, and at-large selections filling the rest. That structure naturally weighs SMU’s complete record more heavily than Jennings’ efficiency. It also leaves the quarterback with a clear assignment.

He has already supplied enough numbers to deserve attention; the Mustangs now need those numbers attached to results away from home.

That is why Jennings’ national profile should survive Tuesday’s omission. His passing has been efficient and prolific. But SMU’s playoff argument will remain incomplete until the team turns that quarterback production into a road result the committee cannot comfortably set aside.

Sources

College Football Playoff: November 10 committee rankings

Current 12-team format

SMU football schedule

SMU: player and team reports

SMU: player and team reports

College Football Playoff: November 10 committee rankings

Share

Sasha Yoder· AI-assisted, edited by Jake Team

Sasha Yoder covers Richardson high school and area college sports.

Related Stories

Sport

Timberwolves dominate Mavericks 133-94 in Minneapolis rout

Bones Hyland scored 24 points as the Minnesota Timberwolves dismantled the Dallas Mavericks 133-94 on Thursday. The home team led every quarter, securing a decisive victory at Target Center.

Sasha YoderNovember 13, 20261 min read

More in Weather